Hitler’s Revolution

Editor’s Note: If you are not aware, there was a recent debate between Dennis Wise (Greatest Story Never Told, Secret Masonic Victory of WWII, etc.) and Christopher Bejerknes (author of a series of slanderous books about Adolf Hitler). You can listen to the debate here on Bitchute. The debate was not very good in my opinion, Dennis had the truth on his side, but he was difficult to understand at times, due to his accent. Bejerknes was very annoying because of the manipulative way he lied about Hitler, primarily by using old British black propaganda lies and staying silent about the real history of World War II. I did find it amazing that he finally admitted the Holocaust was in fact a hoax during the end of the debate! He made a big mistake doing this, in my opinion, because it destroys his “Hitler was a Zionist” thesis. I made this comment in the comments section:

Bejerknes finally admits the holocaust is a fraud, wow at 2:33:40. But that is not good for his thesis. If the Holocaust was used to justify the Zionist movement, then why not murder actual Jews? Why not create actual evidence? Or create documents to make it look like Jews were slaughtered? Hitler was the number one guy, he could have done this instead there is no evidence. It was all left up to the jews themselves to write fake books and produce false testimony.

It seemed like everyone came out of the wood work on this debate, including many paid professional commentors from Israel. There are many good comments, however, but they are difficult to find because they are interspersed with the Israeli garbage. One commentor brought up the book “Hitler’s Revolution” as a great foil for Bejerknes’ books, and he is exactly right. If you have not read the book, it is excellent. The information it contains is copiously backed up with hundreds of foot notes, many of them first hand sources, due to the fact that the author is an excellent researcher who can speak German. It is still available on Amazon here, but you can also get it on the Barnes Review or go to Archive.org and download it for free. Somehow this book is still under the radar on Amazon, even though they just banned almost every edition of Mein Kampf. There are many editions out the there, but the best one is by Thomas Dalton, and although you can not buy it on Amazon anymore, you can buy it on Barnes and Noble here for volume I and here for volume II.

The following is a book review of Hitler’s Revolution from the Barnes Review by John Tiffany, original source is here at the Barnes Review.

The famous reign of Adolf Hitler occurred over a half-century ago, but he remains as popular as ever. And new books on the great leader keep coming out. Like Jesus, thousands of books have been written about Hitler. Biographies have been written by everyone from Alan Bullock to John Toland to Kevin Williams, in every significant language. Most of them are hostile to the man—a testimony to the power of Jewish propaganda.

The best new volume manages to be “politically incorrect” but historically correct. It is by Richard Tedor, an Illinois native who has contributed to TBR. The title is Hitler’s Revolution: Ideology, Social Programs, Foreign Affairs (HR), available from TBR Books. A translator and researcher, Tedor specializes in German foreign policy and war propaganda during the National Socialist era.

The goal of HR is a modest one: to contribute to understanding the axioms of the German people under National Socialism by exploring the spirit of the epoch in which they lived. Tedor was fortunate in being able to draw on previously classified Russian archives, recently released British secret papers and sources in the German language not available in English.

While we might think of Hitler and his movement as “right wing,” in fact National Socialism owes much to liberalism—paleoliberalism, that is. Until it became corrupted, liberalism fought for the rights of the common man—a philosophy carried over into National Socialism. However, as Hitler declared in an April 1939 address: “This state came into being, and all states come into being, through overcoming interests of pure personal will and individual selfishness. Democracy steers recklessly toward placing the individual in the center of everything. In the long run it is impossible to escape the crisis such a conflict will produce.”

As for a congressional or parliamentary form of government, the damaging influence of it soon becomes apparent. The participation of the people exists only on paper. Politicians make a career out of getting re-elected, and focus not on the welfare of the people and of the state but on certain financial circles standing behind them. (HR 14)

Hitler, an uneducated “ordinary” man, out of natural intuition and despite the opposition of experts, cut out high finance. Since the only available collateral for his money was the technical aptitude and great industriousness of the German people, technology and labor became his “gold,” and like magic this system eliminated all unemployment, as Tedor notes Soviet diplomat Kristyan Rakovsky commenting in 1938.

Hitler was the opposite of warlike. In 1936, although Germany was in a position to implement a massive rearmament program, Hitler did not assign priority to the manufacturing of military hardware. Instead, he focused on things like housing construction and improving conditions for the working man.

But Hitler was forced by Polish hostility (and Poland’s allies) to go to war. On September 1, 1939, the German invasion of Poland began. By the next day, Hitler arranged through his foreign minister to England an offer to withdraw his army from Poland and to compensate the Poles for damages, if London would mediate the Danzig Corridor dispute. Prime Minister Chamberlain’s response belies the claim he was a peacenik: He declared war on Germany the next day.

Lord Halifax (Edward Wood) stated, “Now we have forced Hitler to war.”

Had England been willing to cooperate with Germany, Europe’s supremacy in the world would have been undisputed. Instead, the continent’s role as pioneer and steward of civilization was thrown away by Britain’s rulers, controlled by Jews.

Meanwhile things were not going well in Russia, to say the least, with the Jewish Bolsheviks running wild. As many as 8 million people were arrested in 1937 and 1938 alone, of whom less than 15 percent ever went home. The rest, we can be sure, were tortured and/or worked and starved to death. This was a real holocaust, and deserves far more attention than the phony “holocaust” of the “6 million Jews.” Genocide was planned and executed not only for Russia but also for Germany.

While external enemies were bad enough, what really undermined Hitler’s efforts to achieve a better world for us all were the internal turncoats—especially the reactionary German/Prussian nobility, who did not care that their plots would destroy the fatherland and stab in the back the patriotic men fighting at the front.

Wilhelm Canaris

Major subverters included Carl Goerdeler, baron von Weizsaecker, Ewald von Kleist-Schmenzin, Erich Kordt and chief of military intelligence Adm. Wilhelm Canaris. We might add that all the leading generals were in on the plotting or connived at it: Walter von Brauchitsch, the commander-in-chief, Gerd von Rundstedt, Ludwig Beck, Carl-Heinrich von Stuelpnagel, Erwin von Witzleben, commander of the Berlin garrison, and Graf Helldorf, chief of Berlin police, among others.

Nor did they scruple to kill Hitler with a bomb, though these Keystone Kop-like conspirators had no idea what they would do next or what government they might put in place once Hitler was gone; nor did the Allies offer them anything other than unconditional surrender, the same crummy deal they offered Hitler.

In analyzing why Germany lost the war, we must weigh the flagrant disregard of Hitler’s orders, misleading intelligence he received and true intelligence withheld from him, and the militarily useless troop movements carried out without his knowledge, as Tedor notes. Yet establishment historians blame Hitler for the catastrophe.

The much-maligned leader of National Socialist Germany saw the duty of government as to foster, never restrict, the creative energy of the nation and expedite its progress.

The Ultimate Red Pill
Adolf Hitler, The Man Who Fought the Bank
Living in Hitler’s Germany

15 thoughts on “Hitler’s Revolution

  1. Very good article, I’m writing part 3 of “The Lies of Christopher Bjerknes” over at Renegade and it should be out over the weekend. I will credit you in the sources as I discovered the Ludendorff – Mason thing from your first article in 2019. If there is any other pertinent information you would like to recommend I add to part 3, suggestions are welcome. Currently i’m hammering out Bjerknes lies about the Bavarian Soviet Republic that only lasted one month, Karl Myar, Ernst Toller and Eugene Levine..etc.

    1. Great articles Doug, I read the first one, and just started reading the second which is also good, looking forward to the third. Keep it up. I think this guy really struck a cord because of his blatant style of lying. During the debate, he was so sure of his lies, I really thinks he believes them. He was very rude to Dennis, especially at the end. The debate really proves nothing. Jew shills were trying to argue that because Dennis lost, Bejerknes was right. Not quite.

    2. Doug, thank you for your articles about the debate with Dennis and Christopher. I used your articles as well for the post debate stream with Dennis Wise, Dennis Fetcho, The Fascifist and myself. The link to the show is in this thread

  2. For books that may become difficult in the future to purchase and obtain anywhere, I try to buy at least 2 copies (one for reference and one for possible gifting to other concerned individuals). The censorship is getting very aggressive now, and worse by the day. Some books I have 3 or even 4 copies of if these are really good and likely to be banned.

    The above book, Hitler’s Revolution is definitely worth reading, especially by those who are still affected by the propaganda that demonizes both Hitler and the Germans of the period.

Leave a Reply