Hoffman, Makow and Bejerknes: Hitler Haters, and Gatekeepers of the Truth about WWII Part 1

By: Stephen Haller, Editor WW2Truth

About a year ago, I wrote a brief article about Christopher Jon Bejerknes where I tried to expose his blatant lies as a truth “gatekeeper”.  Just like other assassins (Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray, etc.) he has three names, and although he is no patsy for the Jewish/Masonic syndicate, he does make feeble attempts to assassinate the truth about World War II, in particular, spreading lies about Adolf Hitler on behalf of his handlers. He is clever about it, because he does his share of Jew bashing to try to establish “street cred”. As a result, he has steered many sincere truth seekers away from the true history of World War II.  After reading his boring and unoriginal book, “Adolf Hitler Bolshevik and Zionist”, I can safely say that not only is this guy deeply flawed with a very warped agenda, but he is not even original in is thinking, if you can call it that. In the book, Bejerknes literally goes BERSERKNES expressing his venomous hatred towards Hitler,

“Adolf Hitler was neither an anti-Semite nor a grass roots champion of the German people.  He was a treacherous ne’er do well, and a Soviet mole, who became a marionette in a global puppet show when his military superiors discovered that he was a gifted actor and a talented demagogue.  Hitler was a communist stooge tasked with leading Germany into self-destruction, a pied piper with a guttural roar for a flute who marched his troops and his nation into oceans of blood, while they happily danced to his anti-Semitic tune.  Hitler consciously worked for the very forces he pretended to oppose, the Bolsheviks and the Zionists.  He gave Eastern Europe to Stalin and Palestine to the Jews, gift-wrapped with tens of millions of corpses and studded with the broken buildings of ruined ancient cities.” 1

This runaway train rant is nothing we have not heard, in fact, this is the same tune that has been played since 1933 and continues to this day among most court historians. Many revisionist historians have already debunked this garbage, including the great Mike King who wrote the amazon banned book, “The Bad War”.  Check out his article called “Hitler Was Not a Rothschild British Agent” here: http://tomatobubble.com/id956.html.

What Hitler DID do is stand up to Jewish power, and that is what got Germany in trouble.  It does not matter who was in power, The Anglo-Jewish complex was determined to finish what it started in WWI, whether is was Hitler in power or not.  Hitler and the National Socialists drastically minimized Jewish control in Germany in an attempt to save the people from the severe damage the Weimer republic had caused the German people, where Jews conducted a massive campaign to strangle Germany politically, economically and culturally. (see Jewish Domination of Weimar Germany).  The miraculous recovery of Germany after Hitler and the NSDAP came to power is nothing less than extraordinary.  This came out of a genuine love for their people, and could not have been accomplished by a traitor or agent.  To blame the satanic terror bombing campaign conducted by the allies that resulted on Hitler is ridiculous, but very convenient for the globo-Jewish power.  Bejerknes can say what he wants about Hitler and the “evil Nazis”, but none of it compares to what they actually did.  Actions speak louder than words, and we can know them through the fruits of their labor.  Many Germans will tell you that living in National Socialist Germany was a wonderful time (see Living in Hitler’s Germany by: Hans Schmidt).  The only ones who didn’t like it were the Jews and Communists.  Bejerknes NEVER discusses the economic miracle of National Socialist Germany because this would go against his “Hitler as Bolshevik” lie.  Bolshevism is essentially slavery and brutal control masquerading as socialism.  It was never intended to work for the people it was allegedly designed for, the proletarian or workers.  They were merely “useful idiots” and cannon fodder, unknowingly working for the bankers who funded the Bolsheviks.  Hitler also did not lead his people to self-destruction, but in fact, tried to make peace with the allies at every turn, but they rejected his peace offers.  Secondly, it was the allies that created a world war, when in fact, the confrontation with Poland could have simply remained a local conflict.  Again, it was the machinations of England and the United States that made this a World War, not Hitler.

This is not the only rant of his, there are a lot more, and it is kind of embarrassing. He also repeats the same lies over and over again, as if he is following the old propaganda trick FALSELY attributed to Goebbels but most likely said by Lenin, “If you tell a lie enough times, people will start to believe it…” He also does something that I dislike tremendously: super long quotes that go on and on forever. For example, at the end of the book he quotes Patton and it is about 10 pages long. The nerve of him to use Patton to bolster his “argument”. A total mismatch, like most of the book. The book was hard to get through, because I am used to unbiased historical scholarship, like David Irving’s books. Sadly Bejkernes fills his books not with facts but instead fanatical rants, super long quotes, nonsense, and use of court historians as sources and enemies of the NSDAP with an ax to grind with Hitler and/or other members of the NSDAP.

Same Story, Different Time

As I mentioned above, Bejerknes is entirely unoriginal in his lies about Hitler, and has only repackaged the same old garbage and made them look like his own ideas.  Even his claim that Hitler was simply a puppet to many influential puppet masters from Kurt Eisner to Erich Ludendorff is unoriginal. According to Berjerknes however, Hitler’s main controller and handler was Kurt Mayr, who briefly was his superior officer at the end of WWI. 2  Mayr was originally a supporter of National Socialism, but then changed his mind and joined the SPD in 1925. He fled to France in 1933, but was later captured by the Gestapo and died in Buchenwald in 1945.  Bejerknes’ main thesis that Hitler was a controlled agent was based on an article that Mayr wrote in 1941 called “I was Hitler’s Boss”.  It is rather long, and only about 10% has to do with Mayr’s relationship with Hitler, the rest is loaded with every anti-Hitler myth you can think of.  Here is where it gets interesting.  The article was published in “Current History” Magazine, in November of 1941, one month before Pearl Harbor. 3 At this time, there was a massive campaign of disinformation and propagation of lies in the U.S. about Hitler and Germany, primarily orchestrated by British intelligence.  Britain knew that America would not go to war without being thoroughly swayed and convinced that Hitler was a war monger and a threat to America.  This article was part of that plan, and was edited by, wait for it… a devout Jewish Communist, Spencer Brodney (Brodsky) who had connections with the New York Times.  Given this article, it could very well be a clever piece of black propaganda.  In fact, another Jewish disinfo agent, Henry Makow agrees also, that the article could be a propaganda hit piece:

 “While I believe Captain Mayr, who opposed Hitler later (and was killed in Buchenwald) wrote the essay, it may be “black propaganda”.  Published the month before the U.S. entered the war, it may have been designed to create division between Hitler and his designated successor (Goering), and to anger Hitler by belittling him.  The editor of “Current History” was “Spencer Brodney”.  His real name was Leon Brotzky, who was a long-time communist.  “Current History”  was published quarterly by the New Yor Times Company, the organ of the central banking cartel.” 4

 If you do not know who Henry Makow is, here’s his website: https://www.savethemales.ca/. I used to religiously go to his page almost every day back in the 90’s and 2000’s, because he was a clever gatekeeper.  Once I learned the true history of the Holocaust, however, I started to see him for who he was, and saw all the others in the same light as well: Icke, Jones, Cooper, etc.   I remember emailing him several times about how he could still believe in the Holocaust given his clear understanding about Jewish power.  He did email me back, but I was not satisfied with his answers. 

Now, if Makow was not a Jewish disinfo agent like Chris Jon Bejerknes, his next statement would be something like this, “As a result, this article can not be trusted nor can any of it be taken seriously, given the circumstances of its origins and background”.   But nope, here is what we get from the clever Henry Makow:

“Nevertheless, although black propaganda, spins the truth, its effectiveness depends on including a considerable amount of fact.  Much of what Mayr says is consistent with other sources.  I will provide a summary of his most credible revelations and then briefly consider the implications.” 5

Wow, talk about black propaganda within black propaganda.  Actually, not to get too technical, this article by Mayr is actually white propaganda.  No one question’s the source, Karl Mayr (and maybe a little help from Brodney), we question the blatant  and numerous lies and slander. 

His statement is truly amazing and creates a lot of cognitive dissonance.  First he tells us the suspicious origins of the article, the blatant bias of the editor and writer, the claim that it is black propaganda, but then goes on to basically say, “but that’s OK, it still is essentially correct about Hitler.” 

WHAT?????????????  Isn’t it powerful that he calls it out as false propaganda, even naming the Jew and the communist influence?  AHHHH now he has our trust.  Now, when he says, “I will provide a summary of his most credible revelations”, we say “OK Henry, we trust you!, because you told the truth at the beginning!”  Now this is TRUE black propaganda!  From Wikipedia: Black propaganda is a form of propaganda intended to create the impression that it was created by those it is supposed to discredit.  Jews like Henry and Christopher Jon do plenty of Jewish bashing, but that is just to get you to trust them, because if they really were against Jewish power, they wouldn’t believe in the Holocaust fairy tale, LIKE THEY BOTH DO, and they would not bash Hitler, the only leader since maybe Napoleon to stand up to Jewish power. 

So Chris Beserk essentially copied Makow with this Karl Mayr article, since Makow’s post dates all the way back to 2008.  But where did Makow get the idea to peddle the 80% truth 20% lie about Hitler and the National Socialists by discrediting both with “eyewitnesses” like Karl Mayr? Enter Sefton “porky pig” Delmer, head of British intelligence during WWII, black propaganda division.  From another Makow article:

Sefton Delmer, who was the “Daily Express” correspondent in Berlin, describes all this in his autobiography  “Trail Sinister” (1961). He cites documents that show Hitler was ‘acting under Mayr’s orders when he joined the tiny German Workers Party and began to build it up…’ Delmer says Mayr also funded mass meetings and pamphlets in which Hitler railed against the Jews.” 6

Makow again, attempts to gain our trust by telling the truth about who Delmer actually was, “Born and raised in Berlin, Sefton Delmer knew Hitler personally, and had a wide range of confidential sources.  During the war, he took charge of British “black Propaganda” running a range of radio stations aimed at German Soldiers.” 7  Well…, everything seems to be accurate except the part about knowing Hitler and about the fact that Delmer was Jewish.  He did send a letter to Hitler asking for an interview, and Hitler did respond with a letter back stating that he did not want to be interviewed.  I don’t think this qualifies as “personally knew him”. 

The other thing that Makow leaves out is that Delmer did much more than air false radio programs to German soldiers.  He was the leader of a much more massive and all pervasive smear campaign against all things Hitler, National Socialism and Germany.  This fat, ugly four-eyed pig of a creature first got started on his Hitler bashing campaign with a series of articles written in 1939 called, “The Soul of Hitler”.  He was also the head of a massive atrocity propaganda campaign to cover up real allied atrocities with fake German ones, i.e. the Holocaust. If you think this guy can be trusted at all, please read the article here on Sefton Delmer and atrocity propaganda.

Thankfully, not all Jewish revisionists are disinfo agents.  If you have not already read the book “Tell The truth, Shame the Devil” by Gerard Menuhin, check it out.  It is a clear, concise personal history of the author’s and an excellent perspective on the holocaust and Hitler.  Next time, I will take a look at Michael Hoffman who recently transformed from a credible revisionist to a Jewish disinfo agent when he came out with his new book “Hitler Enemy of the people”.  It’s too bad, because he has a great series of articles on Dresden where he backs and includes info from David Irving.  The fact that both Makow and Berjerknes do not site any works by David Irving in any of their writings is also a serious red flag.  He was the pioneer of setting the record straight on WWII, and never once confirmed any of these wacky Hitler conspiracy theories that these three stooges have been recently touting.  Yes, he has back peddled on the Holocaust, but he has become more like a David Duke on that issue and just doesn’t say anything about it anymore.

Well, I bought Berjerknes book and read it so you didn’t have too, and now I guess I have to do the same for Hoffman.  So, I will reluctantly purchase it and read it and when I finish, I will report back… stay tuned!!

Mike King recently wrote an excellent article on this topic as well called: “Slandering Hitler from the ‘Far Right'” Check it out! And a rebuttal of Michael Hoffmann’s new slanderous thesis on Hitler here: “Rebutting Michael Hoffmann’s rebuttal”.

And on the “Know More News” program, Dennis Wise debated Bejerknes on Hitler, here:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/QZAcfCuFYDCR/

Dennis does not do a great job, but that is because he basically is double-teamed by Adam Green, the host, and Bejerknes. I think Mike King should debate this stooge on a level playing ground. That said, there are a lot of views, and many comments to read about the whole issue. There are even many Jews that came out of their holes in the ground to come to the defense of Green and Bejerknes.

Here is another series of great articles on the subject by Doug Thomas of Renegade Tribune:

Part I: http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-lies-of-christopher-bjerknes/

Part II: http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-lies-of-christopher-bjerknes-part-2/

Part III: Coming Soon

  1. Christopher Jon Bejerknes, Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist Volume 1 Communism, (self-published, 2019), Kindle location 1521.
  2. ibid., Kindle location 289.
  3. Karl Mayr, I Was Hitler’s Boss, (New York: Current History, November 1941), page 193-199.
  4. Henry Makow, Was Hitler Just a Pawn?, Rense.com, August 2008.
  5. Ibid.
  6. Henry Makow, Illuminati Bankers Hired Hitler to Start WWII, Rense.com, March 2007.
  7. Ibid.

8 thoughts on “Hoffman, Makow and Bejerknes: Hitler Haters, and Gatekeepers of the Truth about WWII Part 1

  1. I’m very surprised by Hoffman. His recent book which I purchased in Kindle Format can best be described as an unconscious comedy. But, Christopher Jon Bjerknes’ book on Hitler was too stupid, even for me. He reminds me of Jim Condit and Raeto West who also flog this drivel. Sometimes, I wonder if some people are just stupid or malevolent or both. Bjerknes actually wrote a decent book on the Armenian Massacre. ‘The Jewish Massacre of Armenian Christians.” But, his understanding of Hitler and the Third Reich is seriously flawed. This article is well written and needed.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thanks for the comment. Hoffman is surprising, Bejerknes and Makow have always been who they are. You are right, his books are stupid, not sure I have the will to read the other two in the series.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Thank you for the review. Bjerknes is a hack. In a recent debate with Dennis Wise Bjerknes stated that Japan attacked unprovoked and many other ludicrous lies. He followed this up with leaving the debate multiple times, restoring to name calling and interrupting Dennis Wise. I could barely understand Dennis due to Adam Greenberg and Bjerknes interrupting and talking over Mr. Wise. It was 💯 unprofessional and outed both CJB and Adam as the phonies that they are.

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.